Come on people,we all know the world is only 6000 years old!!!Is this another example of satan ';planting'; false evidence?
Yes, it is. Satan is real good at lying and turning people away from God. I wouldn't doubt it if some archaeologist made that on their own just to make headlines to make people turn away from Christ.Is this another example of satan ';planting'; false evidence?
Carbon dating is known to be inaccurate. Check out the recent murder investigation in Jersey, and those remains were only about 40 years old. Even scientists do not trust C-14 dates beyond 2,000 years. Many artifacts of a known date (through historical records) have carbon dated as much older. Part of the problem is that the starting proportions of the isotopes cannot be known. So how can scientists use them to accurately date a sample? Also, radioactive decay is probabilistic. There is no mechanism which controls the rate of decay.
Again, these haughty blatant liars are misleading people in assuming that God created the universe in six days, 6000 years ago, allegedly, according to the Bible. They call it anti-scientific nonsense! Their ignorance of the scriptures and its language is obviously displayed in their presumption that the earth was created 6000 years ago. There are enough scientific evidences that will readily prove to an understanding mind that the earth has existed billions of years ago. The presence of diamond on earth and other precious stones and metals like gold and silver proves the antiquity of the earth.
Most diamonds that we see today were formed millions (if not billions) of years ago. Powerful magma eruptions brought the diamonds to the surface, creating kimberlite pipes. (http://science.howstuffworks.com/diamond…
Carbon Chemistry %26amp; Diamond Crystal Structure
The word ‘diamond’ derives from Greek adamao, meaning ‘I tame’ or ‘I subdue’ or the related word adamas, which means ‘hardest steel’ or ‘hardest substance’. Everyone knows diamonds are hard and beautiful, but did you know a diamond could be the oldest material you might own? While the rock in which diamonds are found may be 50 to 1,600 million years old, the diamonds themselves are approximately 3.3 billion years old. This discrepancy is because the volcanic magma that solidifies into rock where diamonds are found did not create them, but only transported the diamonds from the Earth’s mantle to the surface. Diamonds also may be formed under the high pressures and temperatures at the site of meteorite impacts. The diamonds formed during an impact may be relatively ‘young’, but some meteorites contain star dust, debris from the death of a star, which may include diamond crystals. One such meteorite is known to contain tiny diamonds over 5 billion years old. These diamonds are older than our solar system!
(http://chemistry.about.com/cs/geochemist…
I understand and can comprehend words in at least four major languages and four native dialects of my country of origin. Of course, I want to learn more, but when I have read the Bible, when I was 17 years of age, I have loved it and have learned its language. I have nothing to boast for, for I am nothing; but my God, whom these people say IMAGINARY, is greater than I can describe.
THE LANGUAGE OF THE BIBLE
God was frank enough to say that His thinking is far more superior to our thinking.
(Isaiah 55:8-9) “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.”
As it is very hard for an ordinary person to learn and comprehend the language of a lawyer in the courtroom, it will be very hard also for an ordinary mind as lowly as the earth to comprehend the language of the HIGHEST. A wise reader of the Bible must read it with caution and carefulness, especially, the words which God uttered from His very mouth. There are words in the Bible that were said by humans (believing and non-believing i.e. Psalms 53:1 “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good”), by angels, by demons, and the devil. Sorting all these requires patience and understanding, otherwise, you will be counted as one of those whom the apostle Peter said: perverting or wrestling the word of God.
(2 Peter 3:16-17) “As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own steadfastness.”
This is surely what is being done by these imaginary people!
Nowhere in the Scriptures can you find a verse that the universe or the earth was created only 6000 years ago. I challenge these liars. Come out with a verse that proves your point, and I guarantee you there is none! Maybe these people were mislead by the belief of the Seventh Day Adventist Church and the Jehovah’s Witnesses that creation took place only 6000 years ago. After all, they do not believe in God, so their presumption that the universe and the earth was created only 6000 years ago must have been picked up by them from the ‘trash’ doctrines of these sects.
Witnesses believe that Adam was created in 4026 B.C. and that human beings have been allotted 6000 years of existence until Armageddon and the beginning of the millennium. This figure is based on a “creative week” in which each of six days is equal to 1,000 years, with the Sabbath or seventh day being the beginning of the millennium. Simple arithmetic gives 1975 as the year Armageddon would arrive. Franz explained that Armageddon would actually come 6
Oh no, that wasn't Satan. That was me! I got bored of rearranging the fossils and putting on new sections of the coral reef, and decided I'd go for something a bit more artsy. You like, yes?
Sure....Because, apparently, ';Satan'; has nothing better to do with his time except plant ';false evidence'; in an attempt to bring down Christianity.
Right, and I'm the tooth fairy.
i thought i saw lucifer's claw marks on that thing! he's a d*man fine sculptor, though.
i wonder if he gets a cut of the profit if it goes to auction?
@ AMDG - ';I would seriously question the dating. Carbon dating is only reliable for organic items of a few thousand years old. ';
So in you special little world Ivory is not organic then?
I love busty women too....
but that ';artist'; wasn't very good. It doesn't look like a woman at all... just boobs and little stumps for legs..... but hey, who am I to criticize other's taste in art?
Paahaha! Just cracking up over ';Crikey's'; response! Ahahaa!
Satan loves busty women.
gibbons are not monkeys
Could you at least try harder to be a good troll?
I would seriously question the dating. Carbon dating is only reliable for organic items of a few thousand years old.
After 50,000 years there should be no measurable amounts of Carbon 14 in any specimen. However, many fossils, including carboniferous coal do contain Carbon 14 and are shown by Carbon dating not to be millions of years old, but less than 50,000.
If you want to accept that this ivory carving has been reliably dated to such a great age, then you must also accept the Carbon dating of fossils which can be dated to a similar age. Of course if you do, then the evolutionist, millions of years timescale is rendered completely invalid. So you have your choice, you can't have it both ways?
Edit:
My point is not null and void, because living things only absorb Carbon 14 while they are still ALIVE. Therefore Carboniferous coal and other fossils claimed to be millions of years old, should not contain any measurable amount of Carbon 14 after millions of years. The decay rate of Carbon 14 limits its life to no more than 50,000 years and measurements become increasingly unreliable the older the specimen is.
So according to Carbon dating, coal and many other fossils cannot be millions of years old. Of course evolutionists cannot accept this. As usual, they only accept evidence that supports the evolution story.
But anyone who knows anything about radiometric dating would not even attempt to claim accurate dating for organic material older than about 5 or 6 thousand years.
So for you to claim that anyone can reliably Carbon date items to 30,000 or 40,000 years old is simply wanting to have your cake and eat it.
Tomo .... You obviously did not read my answer properly.
I did not say that ivory was not 'organic', so I don't know where you got that idea from? Please pay attention or you'll continue to make a fool of yourself.
.
Another nail in the coffin of religion , more like.
No comments:
Post a Comment