Am I getting this correctly? No matter what evidence is presented, evolution will always be false, right?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>Am I getting this correctly? No matter what evidence is presented, evolution will always be false, right?
If it's not in the Bible, then there is no proof, don'tcha know?Am I getting this correctly? No matter what evidence is presented, evolution will always be false, right?
Evolution has so many holes, even darwin said his theory was false.
From the INFORMED creationist's view micro-evolution is easily provable.





MACRO-EVOLUTION is not provable. Existing species obviously adapt to their environment, but there is no proof that one species can BECOME another species.


This is actually a very valid point; many individuals of an extant species would have to ALL mutate into a new species AND breed true, AND have a large enough population to continue to do so for macro-evolution to work. It is tough to prove or even believe in.





They ARE different processes and the point is valid.
It's not the truth of evolution I doubt, it's you, and others who accept 'might makes right'. Adaptability is the doctrinal equivalant of faith in science. Is there room in your brave new theology for the meek, the downtrodden? Materialism is a horse, begging for a rider. Karl Marx, Mao, Pol Pot...need I go on? Those leaders preached egalitarianism, and murdered millions, for practical reasons. They were trying to 'evolve' humanity.





I am a Christian, that believes evolution is real. Fire is also real. Use it wisely.
Even if supermarkets start offering roast crocoduck on a stick.





For Thanksgiving, of course.
The presentation of evidence only inconveniences the willfully ignorant. It does not have any persuasive force at all.
';All mass movements generate in their adherents a readiness to die and a proclivity for united action; all of them, irrespective of the doctrine they preach and the program they project, breed fanaticism, enthusiasm, fervent hope, hatred and intolerance; all of them are capable of releasing a powerful flow of activity in certain departments of life; all of them demand blind faith and singlehearted allegiance.';





';All movements, however different in doctrine and aspiration, draw their early adherents from the same types of humanity; they all appeal to the same types of mind.';





';Though there are obvious differences between the fanatical Muslim, the fanatical nationalist, the fanatical Communist, and the fanatical Nazi, it is yet true that the fanaticism which animates them may be viewed and treated as one. The same is true of the force which drives them on to expansion and world dominion. There is a certain uniformity in all types of dedication, of faith, of pursuit of power, of unity and of self-sacrifice. There are vast differences in the contents of holy causes and doctrines, but a certain uniformity in factors which make them effective. He who, like Pascal, finds precise reasons for the effectiveness of Christian doctrine has also found the reasons for the effectiveness of Communist, Nazi and nationalist doctrine. However different the holy causes people die for, they perhaps die basically for the same thing.';





-The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements by Eric Hoffer
true
No, I would not go that far. But it would take a whole lot more evidence for me to believe that evolution theory is a fact. like many people say.





I do not really care about this subject one way or other in regular life. I believe that Genesis record is accurate.
Evolution claims, random change %26amp; natural selection make simple things spontaneously transform into more complex things without recourse to intelligent design. Chance and random changes simply do not produce higher levels of organization %26amp; complexity





I have still yet to see any evidence of one species becoming another. Variations in the same species doesn't equate to evolution. For all we know at this stage is that those variations are preprogrammed in the DNA as possible variations. Mixing of DNA may make a new type of dog, but it is still a dog. So, even if a complex single cell organism managed to spontaneously form with perfect parts one time or even a thousand times, it wouldn't account for the wonderful variety of life here on Earth.
God is still in the process of creating the universe, Some call this process ';evolution';. The evidence of evolution is the proof of this fact.
It is like this 1931 Flat Earth Society ad. It is so much like the Dr Dino site that it is laughable: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/05/1鈥?/a>