What evidence is there to suggest 9/11 was a ';false flag'; attack?

Here are the first 11 of 40 reasons from 9/11 truth


THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY





1) AWOL Chain of Command


a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.


b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.


2) Air Defense Failures


a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.


b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.


c. Was there an air defense standdown?





3) Pentagon Strike


How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?





4) Wargames


a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.


b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were ';real world or exercise.'; Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an ';inside job';?





5) Flight 93


Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?








THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS





6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?





7) Demolition Hypothesis


What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives? (See ';The Case for Demolitions,'; the websites wtc7.net and 911research.wtc7.net, and the influential article by physicist Steven Jones. See also items no. 16 and 24, below.)








FOREKNOWLEDGE %26amp; THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS





8) What did officials know? How did they know it?


a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the ';Big Wedding';), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.


b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th.


c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th.





9) Able Danger, Plus - Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers


a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities - including the CIA, the US military''s ';Able Danger'; program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others.


b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another coincidence.


10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11


A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the ';Phoenix Memo,'; David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration''s order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the ';Bojinka'; plot, and John O''Neil dWhat evidence is there to suggest 9/11 was a ';false flag'; attack?
None really, logically the claim doesn't hold up either. If it had been a false flag attack, it would have pointed to Iraq, the country they wanted to invade. Think of all the trouble they would have saved themselves trying to invent a reason to attack Iraq.





So you have to either assume the government didn't do it, or you have to assume they did do it, but in a very stupid manner. Either way doesn't fit the mythos of conspiracy nuts, who require elaborate, wide spread conspiracies carried out by a slick government to justify their world view.What evidence is there to suggest 9/11 was a ';false flag'; attack?
What evidence is there to suggest 9/11 was a ';false flag'; attack?I disagree but here are two links: Evidence shows 9/11 false flag operation may have been a hyperdimensional ET event.There is empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the events of September 11, 2001 (“9/11”), which involved attacks upon the World Trade Center in New York City, and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., may in fact have been a hyperdimensional “false flag operation”. The hypothesis that 9/11 may be a hyperdimensional false flag operation is advanced in HIGH STRANGENESS: Hyperdimensions and the Process of Alien Abduction, a book by France-based author Laura Knight-Jadczyk. The term “hyperdimensional” means “of or pertaining to a system having more dimensions than naturally found in our universe.” “False flag operations” are defined as “covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.”





The model of 9/11 which a “critical channeling” research source sets out in Knight-Jadczyk’s book holds that the events of September 11, 2001 were in fact a “hyperdimensional false flag operation”, created with converging planning and involvement of a 3rd density “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites and 4th density hostile reptilian (hyperdimensional) Extraterrestrials. The purpose of this series of investigative articles is to examine the evidence supporting this hypothesis about 9/11.





According to the hyperdimensional model, 3rd density refers to the space-time dimension of reality that we humans conventionally inhabit. In the 4th density, time is no longer the regulating dimension it is in our 3rd density, and 4th density beings can travel backward and forwards in time, thus facilitating intervention in 3rd density human public affairs.


This series of articles will investigate 9/11 as a possible hyperdimensional false flag event, including the empirical evidence for 9/11 as a false flag operation by a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites; the use of exotic weapons in the 9/11 false flag operation; the possibility use of hyperdimensional weapons in the false flag event of 9/11; the evidence for joint operations and agreements between a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites and hyperdimensional predatory reptilian 4 D Extraterrestrials; how the war crimes network behind the 9/11 false flag event can be brought to justice; how to diminish the destabilizing influence of 4D predatory reptilian Extraterrestrials in human public affairs.


Because of space limitations, this article is limited to evidence for 9/11 as a false flag operation by a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites. Other components of this investigative series will be covered in future articles.More...............


http://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seattle-E… ---------------- 9/11 WAS a False Flag Attack: Next One is a Nuke, Due NOW


Submitted by Armageddon on April 14, 2008 - 10:42am.Military AnalysisTuesday, February 26, 2008By Captain Eric H. MayFalse Flag Prospects, 2008 Top Three U.S. Target Cities — Forewarning http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com/commun…





The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out. As I’ll detail below, this is exactly how government perpetrators in the U.S. and UK handled the 9/11 and 7/7 ';terror'; attacks, which were in reality government attacks blamed on ';terrorists.';


Although ill health keeps me from working as hard in the area of false flag analysis as I used to, the urging of independent editors and brother intelligence officers has prompted me to write this essay. I’ll keep it short for readers with limited time, but I will include invaluable links for those who want to delve deeper and understand better.


My key aim, as someone who spent five years with the U.S. Army 75th Division conducting military war games, is to convince the American people that the ';next 9/11'; — constantly promised by officials and the media — is likely to be carried out under the guise of future military exercises. If the American people are aware of pending exercises and the danger they represent, then the exercises cannot ';go live'; and effect the very terror events that they are supposed to be rehearsing against


Military Exercises


The 9/11, 2001 attacks in the Uni
Though it is often called conspiracy theory nonsense, it is still worth exploring. Both pearl harbor and 911 generated political responses that benefitted others than the US.





I do thinki it is nonsense, but enjoy reading about it and have learned from the 'whackos' who detail their proofs. Here is the mega site for it.
Jet fuel doesn't burn at high enough temperature to melt the steel frames of the skyscrapers. Oh my God! Lies! Conspiracy!





BUT it burns at a high temperature, which would have caused the frames to weaken and eventually buckle under the weight of the rest of the tower above the crash site. The crash itself would have wrecked the frame. So the towers fell in on themselves.





The conspiracy theories are all totally ridiculous.
Benino---ur an idiot





the beams werent nessisarly melted. the impact destroyed a major section of the beams, and the burning jet fuel mixed with other flamable items in the tower(s)





and from there the towers melted and were destroyed





consipracy for 9/11 is a load of ******* bullshit





if it was i would hate this country for losing my father if it was on their part
now that's a good question! there is plenty of it .everything from bin laudin was cia,holograms,and who really was responsible for 911.NWO is in play here.
NONE!