Should UN cancel the membership of Nepal on technical ground for providing false evidence of its sovereignty?

All members before being admitted are supposed to prove their sovereignty and Nepal had cited a 1856 treaty with Tibet to prove that.


http://www.claudearpi.net/maintenance/up鈥?/a>Should UN cancel the membership of Nepal on technical ground for providing false evidence of its sovereignty?
I don't think they should cancel the membership as it leaves it open for someone else to come and claim it.





Although you do have a point either Tibet was independent or a self governing state there is also the so called Tibetan passport dated 1900.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsepon_W.D.鈥?/a>





Or that it was illegal in the fact that the treaty had to be signed by a Chinese official.Should UN cancel the membership of Nepal on technical ground for providing false evidence of its sovereignty?
Excellent point.





Tibet was a sovereign state at the time treaty was signed. How else could it be explained. Obviously Chinese position does not stand an independent scrutiny.