When there's not enough evidence to prove a statement true and false,the evidence is said to be?

A-false.


B-convincing.


C-powerful.


D-inconclusive.When there's not enough evidence to prove a statement true and false,the evidence is said to be?
dWhen there's not enough evidence to prove a statement true and false,the evidence is said to be?
I'm going with D-Inconclusive. Not knowing the venue for the evidence nor what the evidence is I will give a general response.





If something is neither ';evidence of'; nor ';insufficent'; there is no conclusion to its proof. Proof of what? It has not been established either way, therefore, it is ';inconclusive';.
How could you prove a statement true AND false?





Could you mean True OR False?





If there isn't enough evidence, it's D inconclusive.
D


im not very sure on why you asked this seemingly obvious question


are you


A-stupid


B-not very smart


C-bored


or D- RETARTED!
E - None of the above





It is always the case that it is not possible to prove a statement true and false.
D. Inconclusive.
Evidence that is insufficient to prove something is inconclusive.
D.
D) INCONCLUSIVE





in鈥on鈥lu鈥ive





Pronunciation: (in';kun-klOO'siv), [key]


鈥攁dj.


1. not conclusive; not resolving fully all doubts or questions: inconclusive evidence.


2. without final results or outcome: inconclusive experiments.
D- Inconclusive.





Or maybe it's just truthiness.