true, they certainly aren't evidence for intelligent design
unlike ID, ';evolution works by adapting stuctures and processes that already exist, rather than starting from scratch. If something looses its adaptive value, it cannot simply be junked---instead, it usually remains present in an increasingly reduced form, for a long period of time. This means that far from being perfect, living things often have features that no longer serve any usefull purpose'; (%26amp; might even hinder other beneficial processes). D. BurnsThe flaws found in the structured and organs of many creatures is evidence for the evolution. true or false?
Id is not bound to the rules of evolution. God made things that way if he wanted to and the includes use changing to meet the needs of the environment. The shot at ID was unnecessary to the question.
Report Abuse
I wouldn't call them flaws, just imperfections evolution hasn't had a chance to iron out yet.
If you want a perfect example of this research the mammalian eye. Nobody in their right mind would design the eye this way, it is completely backwards! (literally, backwards).
This is true. Evolution is inelegant. Next time, better to post questions like this in the Biology section.
True, though not by itself conclusive proof. It merely contributes to the body of evidence.
I wonder why this isnt at Religion and Spirituality.
No comments:
Post a Comment