Does an alibi amounts to false testimony if the judge rules in favour of circumstantial evidences against the accused? If the circumstantial evidence that is presented against the accused is true, then it follows that the alibi must be false and hence indictable of false testimony. However, a circumstantial evidence is inconclusive in nature, and it opens the possibility that the judgement might be wrong. In any case, is the alibi giver liable to be charged with false testimony because the judge rules that the accused is guilty on the premise of circumstantial evidence?Does an alibi amounts to false testimony if the judge rules in favour of circumstantial evidences?
It doesn't matter which type evidence resulted in a conviction. If the defendant is convicted, it's possible for the alibi witness to be charged with perjury.
That usually only happens, though, if the alibi witness is involved in the criminal conspiracy. S/he was paid to give false testimony, for example.
Most often, the alibi witness is simply mistaken, so perjury charges are rare.Does an alibi amounts to false testimony if the judge rules in favour of circumstantial evidences?
WHAT ARE YOU studying law or a student in a law school? I should say no to the fact that alibi amounts to false testimony if the judge rules in favor of circumstantial evidence. An alibi is defined as
1: the plea of having been at the time of the commission of an act elsewhere than at the place of commission ; also : the fact or state of having been elsewhere at the time
2: an excuse usually intended to avert blame or punishment (as for failure or negligence).
Everybody is free to state whatever or wherever she or he maybe at the time of the commission of the crime. That is her or his rights to do so. Now you are questioning if her or his alibi is true or not defends on the evidence presented in court or eye witnesses on the case. If the judge rules in favor of circumstantial evidence against the accused therefore the circumstantial evidence out weights her or his alibi in court. Yes circumstantial evidence is inconclusive in some aspect but not all the time. There are certain cases that the judge rules in favor of circumstantial evidence. But this are rare in some cases.
I should say no the alibi giver is NOT liable to be charged with false testimony because the judge rules that the accused is guilty on the premise of circumstantial evidence on the ground that he or she is already charge with the appropriate crime. So what is the point of charging the accuse of perjury or the voluntary violation of an oath or vow either by swearing to what is untrue or by omission to do what has been promised under oath : false swearing when the person is about to go to jail for the crime itself. The court is after the evidence presented in court not the alibi.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Was the holocaust really false & if it was what are the evidences for it?
Are you kidding? The Nazi's themselves took video of it. They took pictures of the lamp shades made of human skin, of the camps, of the creamatoriums.
When the camps were found out, Eisenhower knew people would not believe it so both American, British and Russian film crews were on hand to film it.
The Nazi's left a paper trail about the holocaust a mile long. People who say it didn't happen are fools and are trying to rewrite history.
It happened. It was real.
The evidence is the fact that there are bodies piled up when the Nazi camps were over run. That the paperwork from the Wansee conference is still around and has Hitlers signature. That the guards who worked there admit they worked there. That the people at the Nuremburg trial said it happened.
There is not evidence that it DIDN'T happen because it did.Was the holocaust really false %26amp; if it was what are the evidences for it?
It was a real event. The old death camps were left standing as a reminder--my sister's friend visited Auschwitz in 1980. Besides that, the Nazis left impeccable written and photographic records. Finally, anyone who was in the camps (though they are now old, many are still living) has a number tattooed on their forearm....if you ever meet someone with a number tattoo, ask THEM if the Holocaust was made up.Was the holocaust really false %26amp; if it was what are the evidences for it?
The Holocaust was NOT false.
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/ho鈥?/a>
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lan鈥?/a>
Sadly there are a lot of uneducated redneck racist backward people around trying to spread false lies about this horrific period in history.
Maybe you should seek out some of the Holocaust survivors and talk to them. Or maybe you should seek out some of the Americans and English army guys who went into the camps to liberate the survivors and saw the first hand evidence of the death gas chambers.
There are hundreds of documented cases that show the truth of the Holocaust.
.
You cannot prove a negative, but there is as much proof of the positive as there is for the landing of the Mayflower. Even if it were not for the accounts of the allies who liberated the camps, the accounts of the few who survived, and the buildings that survived, how do you explain to the nieces and nephews what happened to their disappeared uncles and aunts?
If you visit Germany, Poland etc. the gashouses are still standing. They left them up so that it wouldn't be repeated.
historians believe it happened , although if they were wrong it could have been a famine.
No... the Holocaust was NOT false..
When the camps were found out, Eisenhower knew people would not believe it so both American, British and Russian film crews were on hand to film it.
The Nazi's left a paper trail about the holocaust a mile long. People who say it didn't happen are fools and are trying to rewrite history.
It happened. It was real.
The evidence is the fact that there are bodies piled up when the Nazi camps were over run. That the paperwork from the Wansee conference is still around and has Hitlers signature. That the guards who worked there admit they worked there. That the people at the Nuremburg trial said it happened.
There is not evidence that it DIDN'T happen because it did.Was the holocaust really false %26amp; if it was what are the evidences for it?
It was a real event. The old death camps were left standing as a reminder--my sister's friend visited Auschwitz in 1980. Besides that, the Nazis left impeccable written and photographic records. Finally, anyone who was in the camps (though they are now old, many are still living) has a number tattooed on their forearm....if you ever meet someone with a number tattoo, ask THEM if the Holocaust was made up.Was the holocaust really false %26amp; if it was what are the evidences for it?
The Holocaust was NOT false.
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/ho鈥?/a>
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lan鈥?/a>
Sadly there are a lot of uneducated redneck racist backward people around trying to spread false lies about this horrific period in history.
Maybe you should seek out some of the Holocaust survivors and talk to them. Or maybe you should seek out some of the Americans and English army guys who went into the camps to liberate the survivors and saw the first hand evidence of the death gas chambers.
There are hundreds of documented cases that show the truth of the Holocaust.
.
You cannot prove a negative, but there is as much proof of the positive as there is for the landing of the Mayflower. Even if it were not for the accounts of the allies who liberated the camps, the accounts of the few who survived, and the buildings that survived, how do you explain to the nieces and nephews what happened to their disappeared uncles and aunts?
If you visit Germany, Poland etc. the gashouses are still standing. They left them up so that it wouldn't be repeated.
historians believe it happened , although if they were wrong it could have been a famine.
No... the Holocaust was NOT false..
If God didn't want us to have false religions, why didn't he make a religion that has evidence it must be true?
Please do not start saying your religion is right and everything is right about it because you believe so. Think about it. Every religion out there is the same and they all claim to be the words of God, but they can't all be! Why wouldn't God make a way where we can know which religion has to be right sense there is no solid evidence any religion has to be completely right? How are we supposed to know? That's like giving us 3 cups and saying one has a ball but if you pick the wrong one you will burn forever. You cant' see through the cups but whatever cup you put your hand out to is the one you take and put all your faith in it's the right one. Everyone else has a different cup and has just as much faith as you do, so what's the difference? Why would God give us his words when it would be mixed with so many it would get confused and mislead? Why would he punish us for worshiping false God's when no matter how much faith you have, there is no way of 100% knowing which religion is right sense they are all written by man and most likely made by man?If God didn't want us to have false religions, why didn't he make a religion that has evidence it must be true?
Not all religions can be right, as they are so blatantly different on essential elements.
But they can all be wrong.If God didn't want us to have false religions, why didn't he make a religion that has evidence it must be true?
Your question is based on some presumptions which do not bear testimony to the facts.Why you think God would want us to follow a religion,a true one?Why can't we follow Him directly?Many saints have always believed that God has no religion or an affinity to any religion.Also,the very fact that God didn't give us the markers to test and find a true religion, is an indicator that He didn't want us to follow any.Rest all is the matter of conjecture.
Confused?
';Thou shalt worship no other Gods before me';
Does not apply to 'false religions' only.
An example of a false God is money. When a person values money more than God they are worshiping a false God.
God probably giggles at all the different religions because the ones where people do have faith, no matter which one, all lead to the same God.
to make something inevitably true would make it a law, and therefore removes all freedom. if God made it to where we had no choice there would be even more rebellion and ignorance and you would complain even more. (that was Lucipher's predicament)
Take gravity for example.....not too many people challenging that law because we are enslaved by it without the choice.....;^)
islam has evidience it is the true religion from God.
http://www.tubeislam.com/video/1568/Finn鈥?/a>
http://www.tubeislam.com/video/7354/HQ-T鈥?/a>
http://www.tubeislam.com/video/4066/Anci鈥?/a>
http://www.islamtomorrow.com/
i think all the world's religions were meant to be. people were meant to have different beliefs, world views and the like.and no god does not punish you for falling into the wrong belief.
There has been god worshipping since the first homo-sapiens walked the earth. All religion was born out of fear of the unknown. This is an undisputable fact.
Because it's funnier this way.
Religion is man made and so is God being made by man in these generations as to what they think what and how God should be.
It is never written in any Sacred Book that claims as inspired by God that says we have to put up a religion under any name.
Ignorance, greed for power, wealth and authority compelled man to form an organization in the name of his God for his diabolical purpose of controlling the world for his own gain.
Just wait for the time that will be coming when the real God will put an end to all these atrocities.
All religions teach people that they should love God / Allah / Jehovah / first, and secondly, love our fellow man caring about people as you care about yourself.
All the religions are based first on the love of the Supreme Being, or whatever people call the Creator, and secondly on caring about others, especially the sick, the poor and those who are the weakest members of society.
The differences between religions are the peripherals in the same way as all languages express feelings and relationships but use different words and grammar.
He did .... Christianity.
Study the life of Jesus, read about Him in the Gospels written by eye witnesses. There has never been, and never will be anyone who is as good, holy and unselfishly loving as Him.
Compare the behaviour and teaching of Jesus to all the other gurus, self-proclaimed prophets and so-called holy men/women who have started other religions. There is no comparison, to any sensible person these others are obviously all bogus, fraudulent, pretenders.
Look in the real world.
Decode this lyrics '; You'll see';
';Wonderful world';
';Pride and Prejudice';
Did anyone ever search for the missing key to unlock the mystery in time?
Did any hear-say of the dead Mummy from the twilight zone from the Book of the Dead ever tell us about the missing key in time?
Did anyone ever read the Book themselves in time?
Who should we kick on the butts then?
Luke 21.30-36
Luke 9.25,55-56,60
Luke 24.44-45,47-48
Revelation 22.13-17
What do you think?
He gives us plenty of evidence. We just find other places to put that evidence, create new theories to explain it away. Look at evolution, or the Big Bang, or pretty much anything. We either state something didn't happen (using the difference in time invalidate it) or we explain it away using some shaky theory.
So, it's true, I suppose, that Christianity is on just as shaky ground, but only because you refuse to believe the ground is firm.
The difference between Christianity and every other religion is love. Our God loves us and wants the best for us (don't look to Christians as evidence for this, as we are human and often make mistakes). Also, Christians nearly 100 times out of a 100 have a firm knowledge of God. Sometimes it's a feeling... no, not a feeling, a... knowing inside them, that God is there. Sometimes it's that they can actually feel God. Sometimes it's something God did in their lives.
In the end, there is no way I (or anyone else) will be able to convince you here, in a YA answer, that God is real, without you wanting to be convinced. I'm not saying you should want to be convinced (although I think you should, obviously, being a Christian), but everything I have said you can explain away. Just another example of humans doing everything they can to push God away.
...and the people began to forget those signs and wonders which they had heard, and began to be less and less astonished at a sign or a wonder from heaven, insomuch that they began to be hard in their hearts, and blind in their minds, and began to disbelieve all which they had heard and seen.
2 - Imagining up some vain thing in their hearts, that it was wrought by men and by the power of the devil, to lead away and deceive the hearts of the people; and thus did Satan get possession of the hearts of the people again, insomuch that he did blind their eyes and lead them away to believe that the doctrine of Christ was a foolish and a vain thing.
3 - And it came to pass that the people began to wax strong in wickedness and abominations; and they did not believe that there should be any more signs or wonders given; and Satan did go about, leading away the hearts of the people, tempting them and causing them that they should do great wickedness in the land.
Actually God knew that mankind would twist and misunderstand His revelations previously sent in this era. They would create dogmas and using these ideas then create prejudice, separation and hate.
But at the end of an era (now) the prophecy is that ';Knowledge would increase';. And it certainly has. Science has unveiled mysteries that previously were used as a basis for superstitions.
Alternative medicine unravels the connections between mind and body.
You bring valid points above and yet there is still another step which can be taken to solve the issues.
There is a last 'Seal' or Message of God which solves all the confusion between religions and even within religions. But it takes a mind which can open to new ideas and ways of seeing a bigger picture.
If a person is only attached to 'their' way of thinking and 'their' belief system, then they are stuck. Not a whole lot can be done about that except to present the truth and maybe they will see it from another perspective.
There is a much better way to see how all religions (Truth of them) actually fit together to form One Path. No person needs to compete or fight with another faith when they are all parts of One Plan.
It is like the different organs in One Body trying to fight each other for dominance instead of working together for health. Each are necessary and yet perform and different and unique function.
The same for the religions! How brilliant is that!!!
see for yourself: www.maitreya.org
His Holy Living Word and Law is 100% Truth, this is the only thing Christians should adhere to, He commands us ALL, not some to seek the Truth, lest ye be decieved, but ironically enough MANY refuse??? they will ';take their chances'; with relying soley on their clergy or someone else, WOW...even the most well intentioned person can flial miserably or purposely decieve for they are on the ';other side';...appearing only as God's messenger when in fact their intentions are to decieve, satan has to use fellow humans, agreed? We have the Loving Warning to Seek the Truth, we MUST do our part, it is obeying and pleasing Him, agreed? There is Alot at stake, agreed? if you compare Scripture with Scripture (Daniel/Revelations) ';she'; the RCC has caused the whole world/ALL nations to be drunk in her fornications, by spreading pagan/heathen doctrine, traditions and rituals to ALL, not some, ALL have been affected.....this is ';how'; the false religions began...amazingfacts.org...God Bless and Happy Sabbath
The Bible has NOT been translated correctly. If God had picked Lucifer's plan for us then you would get what your asking in your question but then we would lose our free agency. God does not punish anyone for anything.
We have the choices through life. Yes some will be right and others wrong but, thats why Jesus came to atone for our sins and proved resurrection. In the preexistence you fought for Jesus's plan of free agency. It's too late to change now. Thats why there are so many religions and churches is because of misinterpretations, false prophets, etc. which you can thank satan for, not rip in to God.
The reason why Muslims believe the Quran is the true Word of God
______________________________________鈥?br>
Allah sent his Messengers and His revelations to guide the whole humanity to the one true path. Each of the Messengers were given mu'jizat to prove that they were sent by the true Creator of this world. The mu'jizat given to them is the miracles to weaken the faith rejectors' arguments. Some of the mu'jizat given to the Prophets were Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) a.s. was untouched by the fire, Prophet Isa (Jesus) a.s. brought dead people to life, Prophet Musa (Moses) a.s. with his stick, Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. split the moon etc. But their miracles can be refuted in this modern time since we were not there to be the eye witnesses and we can always say the historical records are just fabrications without proofs.
This is the reason why the biggest mu'jizat of Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. is the Quran which is protected and can be used to justify the existence of Allah and thus the validity of Islam as the one true religion. And we can still see Quran around us and it can be available everywhere in this world so that all mankind can witness the mu'jizat and will be held responsible in the Hereafter if they reject the faith.
We Muslims believe that Islam is the one true religion and Quran is the word of God. Quran is the proof of Islam as the true religion. Can anyone 1400 years ago wrote this kind of Book?
The word ';land'; appears 13 times in the Qur'an and the word ';sea'; 32 times, giving a total of 45 references. If we divide that number by that of the number of references to the land we arrive at the figure 28.888888888889%. The number of total references to land and sea, 45, divided by the number of references to the sea in the Qur'an, 32, is 71.111111111111%. Extraordinarily, these figures represent the exact proportions of land and sea on the Earth today.
';Day (yawm)'; is repeated 365 times in singular form, while its plural and dual forms ';days (ayyam and yawmayn)'; together are repeated 30 times. The number of repetitions of the word ';month'; (shahar) is 12.
';Moon'; is mentioned 28 times, exactly as the number of times and phases it appears to earth.
';And it is We who have constructed the heaven with might, and verily, it is We who are steadily expanding it'; (Quran 51:47)
Universe in in constant motion and it is expanding (Alexander Friedmmann, Georges Lemaitre, Edwin Hubble)
';Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before We clove them asunder, and We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?'; (Quran, 21:30)
The Big Bang
';By the sky full of paths and orbits.'; (Quran 51:7)
The entire universe is full of paths and orbits.
';We made the sky a preserved and protected roof yet still they turn away from Our Signs.'; (Quran, 21:32)
The atmosphere and Van Allen Belts
';By Heaven with its cyclical systems.'; (Quran 86:11)
';Returning'; function of the sky (condensed water-rains, reflects radiation and UV ray, reflects radio waves broadcast etc)
';Then He turned to heaven when it was smoke. In two days, He determined them as seven heavens and revealed, in every heaven, its own mandate.'; (Quran 41:12)
Seven layers of atmosphere and their specific functions.
';... And We sent down iron...'; (Quran 57:25)
Iron can only be produced in much bigger stars than the Sun, where the temperature reaches a few hundred million degrees and was sent down to Earth physically.
';Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: from what the earth produces and from themselves and from things unknown to them.'; (Quran 36:36)
Matter and Anti-Matter (Paul Dirac)
';It is He who sends down water in due measure from the sky...'; (Quran 43:11)
Rain keeps falling every year in exactly in the same quantity (513 trillion tons/year) just as revealed in the Quran.
';He has let loose the two seas, converging together, with a barrier between them they do not break through.'; (Quran 55:19-20)
The surface tension between Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea.
';Or (the unbelievers' state) are like the darkness of a fathomless sea which is covered by waves above which are waves above which are clouds, layers of darkness, one upon the other. If he puts out his hand, he can scarcely see it. Those God gives no light to, they have no light.'; (Quran 24:40)
Darkness in the seas (below 200m) and internal waves inside the sea.
';... a lying, sinful forelock.'; (Quran 96:16)
The prefrontal area, which is responsible for the management of particular functions of the brain, lies in the frontal part of the skull.
';He has created both sexes, male and female from a drop of semen which has been ejected.'; (53:45-6)
Gender is determined by the sperm cells from the male, and that the female has no role in this process.
';Yes, We are able to put together in perfect order the very tips of his fingers.'; (Quran 75:3-4)
Everyone, including identical twins has a unique fingerprint.
Feel free to download this free Ebook to explore more about the miracles in Quran:
http://tr1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRF鈥?/a>
Islam is the true religion and it was followed by Ibraham, Ismael, Ishaac,Yacob and the descendants. God revealed the Noble Quran in the 7th century and reinforced it with proofs and evidence. Reserach
';Scientific miracles'; in the Quran.
Quran 41:53
God says:
';We will soon show them Our signs in the Universe and in their own souls, until it will become quite clear to them that it is the truth. Is it not sufficient as regards your Lord that He is a witness over all things?';
Not all religions can be right, as they are so blatantly different on essential elements.
But they can all be wrong.If God didn't want us to have false religions, why didn't he make a religion that has evidence it must be true?
Your question is based on some presumptions which do not bear testimony to the facts.Why you think God would want us to follow a religion,a true one?Why can't we follow Him directly?Many saints have always believed that God has no religion or an affinity to any religion.Also,the very fact that God didn't give us the markers to test and find a true religion, is an indicator that He didn't want us to follow any.Rest all is the matter of conjecture.
Confused?
';Thou shalt worship no other Gods before me';
Does not apply to 'false religions' only.
An example of a false God is money. When a person values money more than God they are worshiping a false God.
God probably giggles at all the different religions because the ones where people do have faith, no matter which one, all lead to the same God.
to make something inevitably true would make it a law, and therefore removes all freedom. if God made it to where we had no choice there would be even more rebellion and ignorance and you would complain even more. (that was Lucipher's predicament)
Take gravity for example.....not too many people challenging that law because we are enslaved by it without the choice.....;^)
islam has evidience it is the true religion from God.
http://www.tubeislam.com/video/1568/Finn鈥?/a>
http://www.tubeislam.com/video/7354/HQ-T鈥?/a>
http://www.tubeislam.com/video/4066/Anci鈥?/a>
http://www.islamtomorrow.com/
i think all the world's religions were meant to be. people were meant to have different beliefs, world views and the like.and no god does not punish you for falling into the wrong belief.
There has been god worshipping since the first homo-sapiens walked the earth. All religion was born out of fear of the unknown. This is an undisputable fact.
Because it's funnier this way.
Religion is man made and so is God being made by man in these generations as to what they think what and how God should be.
It is never written in any Sacred Book that claims as inspired by God that says we have to put up a religion under any name.
Ignorance, greed for power, wealth and authority compelled man to form an organization in the name of his God for his diabolical purpose of controlling the world for his own gain.
Just wait for the time that will be coming when the real God will put an end to all these atrocities.
All religions teach people that they should love God / Allah / Jehovah / first, and secondly, love our fellow man caring about people as you care about yourself.
All the religions are based first on the love of the Supreme Being, or whatever people call the Creator, and secondly on caring about others, especially the sick, the poor and those who are the weakest members of society.
The differences between religions are the peripherals in the same way as all languages express feelings and relationships but use different words and grammar.
He did .... Christianity.
Study the life of Jesus, read about Him in the Gospels written by eye witnesses. There has never been, and never will be anyone who is as good, holy and unselfishly loving as Him.
Compare the behaviour and teaching of Jesus to all the other gurus, self-proclaimed prophets and so-called holy men/women who have started other religions. There is no comparison, to any sensible person these others are obviously all bogus, fraudulent, pretenders.
Look in the real world.
Decode this lyrics '; You'll see';
';Wonderful world';
';Pride and Prejudice';
Did anyone ever search for the missing key to unlock the mystery in time?
Did any hear-say of the dead Mummy from the twilight zone from the Book of the Dead ever tell us about the missing key in time?
Did anyone ever read the Book themselves in time?
Who should we kick on the butts then?
Luke 21.30-36
Luke 9.25,55-56,60
Luke 24.44-45,47-48
Revelation 22.13-17
What do you think?
He gives us plenty of evidence. We just find other places to put that evidence, create new theories to explain it away. Look at evolution, or the Big Bang, or pretty much anything. We either state something didn't happen (using the difference in time invalidate it) or we explain it away using some shaky theory.
So, it's true, I suppose, that Christianity is on just as shaky ground, but only because you refuse to believe the ground is firm.
The difference between Christianity and every other religion is love. Our God loves us and wants the best for us (don't look to Christians as evidence for this, as we are human and often make mistakes). Also, Christians nearly 100 times out of a 100 have a firm knowledge of God. Sometimes it's a feeling... no, not a feeling, a... knowing inside them, that God is there. Sometimes it's that they can actually feel God. Sometimes it's something God did in their lives.
In the end, there is no way I (or anyone else) will be able to convince you here, in a YA answer, that God is real, without you wanting to be convinced. I'm not saying you should want to be convinced (although I think you should, obviously, being a Christian), but everything I have said you can explain away. Just another example of humans doing everything they can to push God away.
...and the people began to forget those signs and wonders which they had heard, and began to be less and less astonished at a sign or a wonder from heaven, insomuch that they began to be hard in their hearts, and blind in their minds, and began to disbelieve all which they had heard and seen.
2 - Imagining up some vain thing in their hearts, that it was wrought by men and by the power of the devil, to lead away and deceive the hearts of the people; and thus did Satan get possession of the hearts of the people again, insomuch that he did blind their eyes and lead them away to believe that the doctrine of Christ was a foolish and a vain thing.
3 - And it came to pass that the people began to wax strong in wickedness and abominations; and they did not believe that there should be any more signs or wonders given; and Satan did go about, leading away the hearts of the people, tempting them and causing them that they should do great wickedness in the land.
Actually God knew that mankind would twist and misunderstand His revelations previously sent in this era. They would create dogmas and using these ideas then create prejudice, separation and hate.
But at the end of an era (now) the prophecy is that ';Knowledge would increase';. And it certainly has. Science has unveiled mysteries that previously were used as a basis for superstitions.
Alternative medicine unravels the connections between mind and body.
You bring valid points above and yet there is still another step which can be taken to solve the issues.
There is a last 'Seal' or Message of God which solves all the confusion between religions and even within religions. But it takes a mind which can open to new ideas and ways of seeing a bigger picture.
If a person is only attached to 'their' way of thinking and 'their' belief system, then they are stuck. Not a whole lot can be done about that except to present the truth and maybe they will see it from another perspective.
There is a much better way to see how all religions (Truth of them) actually fit together to form One Path. No person needs to compete or fight with another faith when they are all parts of One Plan.
It is like the different organs in One Body trying to fight each other for dominance instead of working together for health. Each are necessary and yet perform and different and unique function.
The same for the religions! How brilliant is that!!!
see for yourself: www.maitreya.org
His Holy Living Word and Law is 100% Truth, this is the only thing Christians should adhere to, He commands us ALL, not some to seek the Truth, lest ye be decieved, but ironically enough MANY refuse??? they will ';take their chances'; with relying soley on their clergy or someone else, WOW...even the most well intentioned person can flial miserably or purposely decieve for they are on the ';other side';...appearing only as God's messenger when in fact their intentions are to decieve, satan has to use fellow humans, agreed? We have the Loving Warning to Seek the Truth, we MUST do our part, it is obeying and pleasing Him, agreed? There is Alot at stake, agreed? if you compare Scripture with Scripture (Daniel/Revelations) ';she'; the RCC has caused the whole world/ALL nations to be drunk in her fornications, by spreading pagan/heathen doctrine, traditions and rituals to ALL, not some, ALL have been affected.....this is ';how'; the false religions began...amazingfacts.org...God Bless and Happy Sabbath
The Bible has NOT been translated correctly. If God had picked Lucifer's plan for us then you would get what your asking in your question but then we would lose our free agency. God does not punish anyone for anything.
We have the choices through life. Yes some will be right and others wrong but, thats why Jesus came to atone for our sins and proved resurrection. In the preexistence you fought for Jesus's plan of free agency. It's too late to change now. Thats why there are so many religions and churches is because of misinterpretations, false prophets, etc. which you can thank satan for, not rip in to God.
The reason why Muslims believe the Quran is the true Word of God
______________________________________鈥?br>
Allah sent his Messengers and His revelations to guide the whole humanity to the one true path. Each of the Messengers were given mu'jizat to prove that they were sent by the true Creator of this world. The mu'jizat given to them is the miracles to weaken the faith rejectors' arguments. Some of the mu'jizat given to the Prophets were Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) a.s. was untouched by the fire, Prophet Isa (Jesus) a.s. brought dead people to life, Prophet Musa (Moses) a.s. with his stick, Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. split the moon etc. But their miracles can be refuted in this modern time since we were not there to be the eye witnesses and we can always say the historical records are just fabrications without proofs.
This is the reason why the biggest mu'jizat of Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. is the Quran which is protected and can be used to justify the existence of Allah and thus the validity of Islam as the one true religion. And we can still see Quran around us and it can be available everywhere in this world so that all mankind can witness the mu'jizat and will be held responsible in the Hereafter if they reject the faith.
We Muslims believe that Islam is the one true religion and Quran is the word of God. Quran is the proof of Islam as the true religion. Can anyone 1400 years ago wrote this kind of Book?
The word ';land'; appears 13 times in the Qur'an and the word ';sea'; 32 times, giving a total of 45 references. If we divide that number by that of the number of references to the land we arrive at the figure 28.888888888889%. The number of total references to land and sea, 45, divided by the number of references to the sea in the Qur'an, 32, is 71.111111111111%. Extraordinarily, these figures represent the exact proportions of land and sea on the Earth today.
';Day (yawm)'; is repeated 365 times in singular form, while its plural and dual forms ';days (ayyam and yawmayn)'; together are repeated 30 times. The number of repetitions of the word ';month'; (shahar) is 12.
';Moon'; is mentioned 28 times, exactly as the number of times and phases it appears to earth.
';And it is We who have constructed the heaven with might, and verily, it is We who are steadily expanding it'; (Quran 51:47)
Universe in in constant motion and it is expanding (Alexander Friedmmann, Georges Lemaitre, Edwin Hubble)
';Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before We clove them asunder, and We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?'; (Quran, 21:30)
The Big Bang
';By the sky full of paths and orbits.'; (Quran 51:7)
The entire universe is full of paths and orbits.
';We made the sky a preserved and protected roof yet still they turn away from Our Signs.'; (Quran, 21:32)
The atmosphere and Van Allen Belts
';By Heaven with its cyclical systems.'; (Quran 86:11)
';Returning'; function of the sky (condensed water-rains, reflects radiation and UV ray, reflects radio waves broadcast etc)
';Then He turned to heaven when it was smoke. In two days, He determined them as seven heavens and revealed, in every heaven, its own mandate.'; (Quran 41:12)
Seven layers of atmosphere and their specific functions.
';... And We sent down iron...'; (Quran 57:25)
Iron can only be produced in much bigger stars than the Sun, where the temperature reaches a few hundred million degrees and was sent down to Earth physically.
';Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: from what the earth produces and from themselves and from things unknown to them.'; (Quran 36:36)
Matter and Anti-Matter (Paul Dirac)
';It is He who sends down water in due measure from the sky...'; (Quran 43:11)
Rain keeps falling every year in exactly in the same quantity (513 trillion tons/year) just as revealed in the Quran.
';He has let loose the two seas, converging together, with a barrier between them they do not break through.'; (Quran 55:19-20)
The surface tension between Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea.
';Or (the unbelievers' state) are like the darkness of a fathomless sea which is covered by waves above which are waves above which are clouds, layers of darkness, one upon the other. If he puts out his hand, he can scarcely see it. Those God gives no light to, they have no light.'; (Quran 24:40)
Darkness in the seas (below 200m) and internal waves inside the sea.
';... a lying, sinful forelock.'; (Quran 96:16)
The prefrontal area, which is responsible for the management of particular functions of the brain, lies in the frontal part of the skull.
';He has created both sexes, male and female from a drop of semen which has been ejected.'; (53:45-6)
Gender is determined by the sperm cells from the male, and that the female has no role in this process.
';Yes, We are able to put together in perfect order the very tips of his fingers.'; (Quran 75:3-4)
Everyone, including identical twins has a unique fingerprint.
Feel free to download this free Ebook to explore more about the miracles in Quran:
http://tr1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRF鈥?/a>
Islam is the true religion and it was followed by Ibraham, Ismael, Ishaac,Yacob and the descendants. God revealed the Noble Quran in the 7th century and reinforced it with proofs and evidence. Reserach
';Scientific miracles'; in the Quran.
Quran 41:53
God says:
';We will soon show them Our signs in the Universe and in their own souls, until it will become quite clear to them that it is the truth. Is it not sufficient as regards your Lord that He is a witness over all things?';
Is there any real hard-core evidence to suggest that Jesus is real and other Gods are false?
There's no evidence that there are any deities
But there is evidence that a MAN called Jesus/Yeshua did exist: Tacitus, Lucian, Pliny, Celsus, Suetonius, Thallus and even the Jewish Talmud
Fundamental atheists won't accept this, but they are as opened minded as Young Earthers. But they will believe the most illogical story that Peter %26amp; Paul concocted the whole thing, for which they were executed. Christians were being killed for their faith not 30 years after Jesus' crucifixion 1400 miles away in Rome
People have been contesting Jesus' divinity for millenia, but only in the last 2 centuries have a few people questioned His existence and not particularly well
EDIT: It is likely that douments which confirm the existence of a man called Jesus/Yesuha were supressed by the very people who have benefited from making Him divine
The whole Titus Flavius Josephus 'deal' has not been proved to be a forgery, if youre really interested watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I93OLYzew鈥?/a>Is there any real hard-core evidence to suggest that Jesus is real and other Gods are false?
Jesus fulfilled over 300 prophecies, such as when and where the Messiah would be born and when and how the Messiah would die.
Jesus also said that he would prove he is God in human form by his resurrection from the dead. There were over 500 people who saw Jesus physically alive after his resurrection from the dead.
The New Testament was written during the life times of those who were alive during the 3 years of Jesus' ministry. There were no eyewitnesses at that time claiming that Jesus was not real or that Jesus did not performed miracles.Is there any real hard-core evidence to suggest that Jesus is real and other Gods are false?
Two important things:
Zeus has no historical and non-theologic evidence that he walked the earth, Jesus does.
About the prophecy thing. Only the Christian God has provided the prophecy to be fulfilled centuries in advance. Look up the biblical prophecies on the city of TYRE if you would like a real world example. No other myths, as you call them, deliver like that does.
No. There's no unmistakable evidence to suggest any of them are real.
No hard evidence.
I think, strength, influence and richness of Christians may lie behind this suggestion.
Trust me, if I've seen it, I would have sent it too you already.
No there isn't.
Of course there isn't.
only thing they have as proof is bible , which is a bull $.hit
If your faith is strong enough you can believe anything. 鈫戔啈鈫?br>
It doesn't need to be true.
....
[Edit]
I'm not sure where SundayLunch is getting his information, but I have been familiar with Tacitus' reference to Jesus Christ for years, and it is one of the most obvious forgeries in the whole of classical literature. If you know anything about Tacitus that half-sentence sticks out the way that a couple bars of Britney Spears would in a Sonic Youth video.
Maybe the Church only tampered with a classical text that once (after all, the Christians only had around fourteen hundred years to insert messages favourable to themselves in genuine Roman texts). This seems likely: Christians have always been spectacularly honest and trustworthy folk (as they still are).
Suetonius does not refer to anybody called Christ living in Palestine in the early years of the first century. Suetonius refers to somebody called Chrestus (a common name among Greek metics) living in Rome around 100 AD.
Pliny the younger talks about Christianity as one of several cult religions causing problems in Rome towards the end of the first century.
And so on .....
yes
But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you
But there is evidence that a MAN called Jesus/Yeshua did exist: Tacitus, Lucian, Pliny, Celsus, Suetonius, Thallus and even the Jewish Talmud
Fundamental atheists won't accept this, but they are as opened minded as Young Earthers. But they will believe the most illogical story that Peter %26amp; Paul concocted the whole thing, for which they were executed. Christians were being killed for their faith not 30 years after Jesus' crucifixion 1400 miles away in Rome
People have been contesting Jesus' divinity for millenia, but only in the last 2 centuries have a few people questioned His existence and not particularly well
EDIT: It is likely that douments which confirm the existence of a man called Jesus/Yesuha were supressed by the very people who have benefited from making Him divine
The whole Titus Flavius Josephus 'deal' has not been proved to be a forgery, if youre really interested watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I93OLYzew鈥?/a>Is there any real hard-core evidence to suggest that Jesus is real and other Gods are false?
Jesus fulfilled over 300 prophecies, such as when and where the Messiah would be born and when and how the Messiah would die.
Jesus also said that he would prove he is God in human form by his resurrection from the dead. There were over 500 people who saw Jesus physically alive after his resurrection from the dead.
The New Testament was written during the life times of those who were alive during the 3 years of Jesus' ministry. There were no eyewitnesses at that time claiming that Jesus was not real or that Jesus did not performed miracles.Is there any real hard-core evidence to suggest that Jesus is real and other Gods are false?
Two important things:
Zeus has no historical and non-theologic evidence that he walked the earth, Jesus does.
About the prophecy thing. Only the Christian God has provided the prophecy to be fulfilled centuries in advance. Look up the biblical prophecies on the city of TYRE if you would like a real world example. No other myths, as you call them, deliver like that does.
No. There's no unmistakable evidence to suggest any of them are real.
No hard evidence.
I think, strength, influence and richness of Christians may lie behind this suggestion.
Trust me, if I've seen it, I would have sent it too you already.
No there isn't.
Of course there isn't.
only thing they have as proof is bible , which is a bull $.hit
If your faith is strong enough you can believe anything. 鈫戔啈鈫?br>
It doesn't need to be true.
....
[Edit]
I'm not sure where SundayLunch is getting his information, but I have been familiar with Tacitus' reference to Jesus Christ for years, and it is one of the most obvious forgeries in the whole of classical literature. If you know anything about Tacitus that half-sentence sticks out the way that a couple bars of Britney Spears would in a Sonic Youth video.
Maybe the Church only tampered with a classical text that once (after all, the Christians only had around fourteen hundred years to insert messages favourable to themselves in genuine Roman texts). This seems likely: Christians have always been spectacularly honest and trustworthy folk (as they still are).
Suetonius does not refer to anybody called Christ living in Palestine in the early years of the first century. Suetonius refers to somebody called Chrestus (a common name among Greek metics) living in Rome around 100 AD.
Pliny the younger talks about Christianity as one of several cult religions causing problems in Rome towards the end of the first century.
And so on .....
yes
But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you
If any evidence shows that what we believe is untrue then we should reject it as false...?
...Since our beliefs must be true.
QUESTION:
Isn't that why we're better than non-believers?If any evidence shows that what we believe is untrue then we should reject it as false...?
Well what makes you think you are better than the non-believers. That fact that you think you have the divine answer. When that divine answer runs against the evidence, you reject it.
Is your faith so strong that you are divine, or is it so strong that you are blind.If any evidence shows that what we believe is untrue then we should reject it as false...?
Answer is in your question... If you receive undeniable evidence that what you believe in isn't true then you know for a fact that it just isn't true. You can't really unknow something, it still has a huge impact on your behavior and how you think. When a person, as you say, rejects the facts for false, I've noticed that what they are probably doing segregating their minds into different schools of thought that one can switch between depending on whether they're at church or amongst peers, one example being science mode and faith mode. I think this is what most people do when their ';assurance of things hoped for, proof of things not seen'; is flat out disproven. Good on you if you have the mental stamina to keep that up though. Some people do go the extra mile, and subconsciously smother the things backed by facts. Such mental gymnastics doesn't negate facts that have set up camp in your mind, it just results in different behavior. I find that these people are either smug with the light of Christ or super duper belligerent if facts are brought up. It's not frequent that a person who is lying to themselves about facts is willing to sit down and have an honest and agreeable discussion about either science or theology.
There are just too many faiths with members all running around with a case of the warm fuzzies for their 'one true faith' for my comfort. My favorite crap counterargument to this is, ';it's ok! all religions have a little bit of truth to them, but we're still the right one!';
What a narrow way of looking at things. Why must our beliefs be true? Every single person has some beliefs which are not shared by others. If we are not open to the possibility of being wrong,then we are not open to the possibility of learning that we are wrong and then we can't learn more. There are so many examples of wrong beliefs,even to the point of people being killed because they would not conform to so called ';right';beliefs. The earth being the center of the universe. Or being flat. It sounds ridiculous today. There is nothing wrong with being ignorant about facts. What is wrong is being so narrow minded that you cannot learn more.
... so you are willing to believe that which is untrue, and you think that makes you better than people that are not deluded?
QUESTION:
Isn't that why we're better than non-believers?If any evidence shows that what we believe is untrue then we should reject it as false...?
Well what makes you think you are better than the non-believers. That fact that you think you have the divine answer. When that divine answer runs against the evidence, you reject it.
Is your faith so strong that you are divine, or is it so strong that you are blind.If any evidence shows that what we believe is untrue then we should reject it as false...?
Answer is in your question... If you receive undeniable evidence that what you believe in isn't true then you know for a fact that it just isn't true. You can't really unknow something, it still has a huge impact on your behavior and how you think. When a person, as you say, rejects the facts for false, I've noticed that what they are probably doing segregating their minds into different schools of thought that one can switch between depending on whether they're at church or amongst peers, one example being science mode and faith mode. I think this is what most people do when their ';assurance of things hoped for, proof of things not seen'; is flat out disproven. Good on you if you have the mental stamina to keep that up though. Some people do go the extra mile, and subconsciously smother the things backed by facts. Such mental gymnastics doesn't negate facts that have set up camp in your mind, it just results in different behavior. I find that these people are either smug with the light of Christ or super duper belligerent if facts are brought up. It's not frequent that a person who is lying to themselves about facts is willing to sit down and have an honest and agreeable discussion about either science or theology.
There are just too many faiths with members all running around with a case of the warm fuzzies for their 'one true faith' for my comfort. My favorite crap counterargument to this is, ';it's ok! all religions have a little bit of truth to them, but we're still the right one!';
What a narrow way of looking at things. Why must our beliefs be true? Every single person has some beliefs which are not shared by others. If we are not open to the possibility of being wrong,then we are not open to the possibility of learning that we are wrong and then we can't learn more. There are so many examples of wrong beliefs,even to the point of people being killed because they would not conform to so called ';right';beliefs. The earth being the center of the universe. Or being flat. It sounds ridiculous today. There is nothing wrong with being ignorant about facts. What is wrong is being so narrow minded that you cannot learn more.
... so you are willing to believe that which is untrue, and you think that makes you better than people that are not deluded?
Is there any greater evidence of fascism in the USA, then the false accusations of socialism & anti labor?
stance of the republican party??
Think about it, thats how the nazis gained control in germany......scapegoating labor and engaging in witch hunts for socialists and communists. They eventually did engage in aggressive wars against countries that had not attacked them and established concentration camps in distant lands and embraced torture and gestapo like spying on citizens too.....as we all know. The similarities are eerie.Is there any greater evidence of fascism in the USA, then the false accusations of socialism %26amp; anti labor?
No. You need to put more thought into your argument. It doesn't hold water.Is there any greater evidence of fascism in the USA, then the false accusations of socialism %26amp; anti labor?
hussyinterrupted perhaps you should read a book that doesn't have cartoon pictures or size 24 fonts. NSDAP was a conveniant name for Hitler to gather votes from the entire moderate spectrum of German voters, while appealing to the more moderate extremists. Hitler hated socialism but he was still pragmatic in securing the leadership of Germany, and to question whether or not he was a fascist would be like asking if you can drink sewage. Ridiculous.
What you are saying actually has some validity to it (without going overboard), but realise both sides spread false accusations: it's part of politics.
Unfortunately most people don't understand the difference between a socialist republic (communism, like in China/Cuba) and a socialist democracy (mixed economy, like in Sweden). The US is heading towards neither, but definitely not the first. Socialists in the US most often base their models on the Sweden system or similar, and last I checked, Sweden was a great place to live.
The easy answer to this question is YES....there is more clear evidence...it is called the 750 Trillion dollars + bailout of the multinational corporate banks at the expense and against the wishes of the populace.
That by its very nature is Fascism.
I mean billion not trillion but the outcome is the same
YES THEY DO SOUND VERY NAZI LIKE IN EVERY WAY.
AND THESE MCCAIN SHEEP ARE FALLING FOR IT.
THEY HAVE THE SUPPORT OF WHITE SUPREMEST AND DEMONIZE OBAMA LIKE HITLER DID AS WELL.
FASCIST HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL OF PEOPLES LIVES -OFTEN BY FORCE.
I HAVE HEARD MCCAIN SUPPORTERS TALK BADLY ABOUT THE JEWISH PEOPLE -BLACKS AND HISPANICS.
THEY EVOKE REAL ANGER AND VIOLENCE.
AND MCCAIN NOR PALIN HAVE NOT SAID BUT ONE WORD TO DISCOURAGE THIS
I agree. The Republicans are the one's looking more like the Nazi's these days. Demonizing, false accusations to create fear, etc.
Yeah because the nazi party was actually called the ';National Socialist German Workers Party';. Sure sounds like they wanted to destroy socialism and the workers. Read a book you dolt.
Is there greater evidence of a looney when he compares USA to Nazi Germany?
All organization can be misused and hijacked! Just look at the Islamic Extremists!
what is eerie is the simularities of reverend wrights teaching and hitler
You may need to go look that up again. You have it wrong. And Obama is a socialist...period.
ummm, bigfoot
Have a glass of wine. None of this is that serious.
nogray hair
Think about it, thats how the nazis gained control in germany......scapegoating labor and engaging in witch hunts for socialists and communists. They eventually did engage in aggressive wars against countries that had not attacked them and established concentration camps in distant lands and embraced torture and gestapo like spying on citizens too.....as we all know. The similarities are eerie.Is there any greater evidence of fascism in the USA, then the false accusations of socialism %26amp; anti labor?
No. You need to put more thought into your argument. It doesn't hold water.Is there any greater evidence of fascism in the USA, then the false accusations of socialism %26amp; anti labor?
hussyinterrupted perhaps you should read a book that doesn't have cartoon pictures or size 24 fonts. NSDAP was a conveniant name for Hitler to gather votes from the entire moderate spectrum of German voters, while appealing to the more moderate extremists. Hitler hated socialism but he was still pragmatic in securing the leadership of Germany, and to question whether or not he was a fascist would be like asking if you can drink sewage. Ridiculous.
What you are saying actually has some validity to it (without going overboard), but realise both sides spread false accusations: it's part of politics.
Unfortunately most people don't understand the difference between a socialist republic (communism, like in China/Cuba) and a socialist democracy (mixed economy, like in Sweden). The US is heading towards neither, but definitely not the first. Socialists in the US most often base their models on the Sweden system or similar, and last I checked, Sweden was a great place to live.
The easy answer to this question is YES....there is more clear evidence...it is called the 750 Trillion dollars + bailout of the multinational corporate banks at the expense and against the wishes of the populace.
That by its very nature is Fascism.
I mean billion not trillion but the outcome is the same
YES THEY DO SOUND VERY NAZI LIKE IN EVERY WAY.
AND THESE MCCAIN SHEEP ARE FALLING FOR IT.
THEY HAVE THE SUPPORT OF WHITE SUPREMEST AND DEMONIZE OBAMA LIKE HITLER DID AS WELL.
FASCIST HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL OF PEOPLES LIVES -OFTEN BY FORCE.
I HAVE HEARD MCCAIN SUPPORTERS TALK BADLY ABOUT THE JEWISH PEOPLE -BLACKS AND HISPANICS.
THEY EVOKE REAL ANGER AND VIOLENCE.
AND MCCAIN NOR PALIN HAVE NOT SAID BUT ONE WORD TO DISCOURAGE THIS
I agree. The Republicans are the one's looking more like the Nazi's these days. Demonizing, false accusations to create fear, etc.
Yeah because the nazi party was actually called the ';National Socialist German Workers Party';. Sure sounds like they wanted to destroy socialism and the workers. Read a book you dolt.
Is there greater evidence of a looney when he compares USA to Nazi Germany?
All organization can be misused and hijacked! Just look at the Islamic Extremists!
what is eerie is the simularities of reverend wrights teaching and hitler
You may need to go look that up again. You have it wrong. And Obama is a socialist...period.
ummm, bigfoot
Have a glass of wine. None of this is that serious.
no
How long does it take a Christian to examine all the evidence for evolution and conclude it's false?
10 hours ago: someone asks for the evidence for evolution (incorrectly calling it ';proof'; - which is a concept in math, not science)
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
8 hours ago: That person concludes all the evidence is false:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
';ive read the theory of evolution and the so called but to say everything just fell into place the solar system the elements of gravity and the distance of the planets from the sun and the moon being perfect the rotation of the earth all just happening by coincidence is too hard to believe';
Do you feel two hours is enough time to examine the evidence? Is it enough to understand evolution and astronomy are not the same thing?How long does it take a Christian to examine all the evidence for evolution and conclude it's false?
Here is an answer i got from a christian concerning evolution:
';I don't care how evolution says the world came about. I really refuse to care. Besides evolution is a theory and the Bible is the LAW of God. Now I do know enough about science to know that LAW always overrides theory. I refuse to except any evidence other than what is presented in the Bible as to how the earth got here.';
I think they all think like this.How long does it take a Christian to examine all the evidence for evolution and conclude it's false?
let me breakdown his 2 hours for you.
5 minutes reading the first paragraph over and over. 5 minutes looking up words from that paragraph in the dictionary. 5 minutes of reading that first paragraph some more. 2 minute prayer to God for understanding. 2 minutes later when understanding did not come, he concluded God didn't approve of the the theory or his understanding prayer would have been answered. 1 hour and 41 minutes of reading about evolution from a fundie website with pictures. and done!
It should take longer than two hours for:
1. A person to examine all of the evidence for the theory of evolution, process it, and determine it to be false.
2. A person to read all the way through the Bible, process it, and determine it to be false.
Both sides are pretty quick to judge sometimes. It took me 17 years to figure out where I stand.
I am Christian and I think that Christians need not study evolution unless they have doubts. Otherwise, disproving evolution to a believer of it is somewhat blatant, disrespectful, and out of place.
I don't think this Christian has really understood all the nuts and bolts of evolution and the universe, and two hours isn't really enough, even if you're skimming galaxies of information.
His first question shows he is clueless, a Poe or is deliberately ignoring the evidence.
He is just regurgitating the non-stop lies spewed by Hovind et al and the later ';questions'; are just confirmation of that.
And as for ';fossils only showed that something has died'; you are as clueless as ';disciple';. Evolution and the theory was based on the examination of existing organisms, examination in detail that you might find difficult to comprehend.
Two hours is plenty time for them realize the difference between evolution and how the universe was created.. Obviously they are a liar in saying they've ';read the theory of evolution.';
Don't worry, Rev. 21:8 says they, as a liar, ';will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur.'; So it all works out in the end.
I know some christians who believe in evolution and study physics. It's just when they hear someone saying ';praise the lord'; that they switch off all the common sense and enter a different world altogether. I admit they are really very versatile in this switching and jumping between two modes. Basically, they don't mix them, when they're in one mode, they don't think of the other.
';ive read the theory of evolution and the so called but to say everything just fell into place the solar system the elements of gravity and the distance of the planets from the sun and the moon being perfect the rotation of the earth all just happening by coincidence is too hard to believe';
That has nothing to do with evolution in the first place
Dude to tell you the truth I really don't give a damn about Christians. They are doomed. They lack knowledge of many things which is even in the Bible. Christians go against their own Bibles. You read Bible Code and it speaks about a connection between Evolution and the Hebrew deity Yahweh. If its not in the non complex Bible Christians will not believe it. Only because they limit their mind. For instance Exodus 3:15 all Christians believe that God's name is ' I AM who I Am', when that's not a name being revealed but a statement. They lack the knowledge of simple stuff that a child can understand and they expect to be saving peoples soul. Give me a damn break.
Don't go generalizing, now. You know it's just this individual you're talking about, and it didn't take him 2 hours to understand and reject it all, he was just having dinner. He had already rejected it before turning on the microwave.
How long does it take a Christian to examine all the evidence for evolution and conclude it's false?
About as long as it took 'C' to come up with such a witty answer.
If it was up to christians they would still have the Earth at the center of the Solar system. Look how long it took for them to apologize for that.
As always they just make stuff up.
Having read ';the theory of evolution'; (which is a doubtful claim at best) means nothing, even if it were true.
The question shows the person has no understanding of evolution.
Examine evidence?
Creationists?
ROFLcopter
and its funny once again breaking the commandment by bearing false witness cause if dud had read anything about evolution he wouldnt even touch astronomy
I'm betting that person didn't even look at what was presented. He probably just watched another Hovind video.
After two hours he hasn't even figured out the difference between biology and astronomy? LOL
What would you say to someone like Dean Kenyon, a former chemical evolutionist who spent many years in study and has concluded that the Darwinian explanations (as they now exist) are no better than fairy tales... in fact, they are worse than fairy tales. The tales are at least meant to be taken as tales. But this so called theory - with all its 'just so stories' and endless speculations - is meant to be taken seriously!
2 seconds.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
Bones and fossils only prove that something died
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
8 hours ago: That person concludes all the evidence is false:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
';ive read the theory of evolution and the so called but to say everything just fell into place the solar system the elements of gravity and the distance of the planets from the sun and the moon being perfect the rotation of the earth all just happening by coincidence is too hard to believe';
Do you feel two hours is enough time to examine the evidence? Is it enough to understand evolution and astronomy are not the same thing?How long does it take a Christian to examine all the evidence for evolution and conclude it's false?
Here is an answer i got from a christian concerning evolution:
';I don't care how evolution says the world came about. I really refuse to care. Besides evolution is a theory and the Bible is the LAW of God. Now I do know enough about science to know that LAW always overrides theory. I refuse to except any evidence other than what is presented in the Bible as to how the earth got here.';
I think they all think like this.How long does it take a Christian to examine all the evidence for evolution and conclude it's false?
let me breakdown his 2 hours for you.
5 minutes reading the first paragraph over and over. 5 minutes looking up words from that paragraph in the dictionary. 5 minutes of reading that first paragraph some more. 2 minute prayer to God for understanding. 2 minutes later when understanding did not come, he concluded God didn't approve of the the theory or his understanding prayer would have been answered. 1 hour and 41 minutes of reading about evolution from a fundie website with pictures. and done!
It should take longer than two hours for:
1. A person to examine all of the evidence for the theory of evolution, process it, and determine it to be false.
2. A person to read all the way through the Bible, process it, and determine it to be false.
Both sides are pretty quick to judge sometimes. It took me 17 years to figure out where I stand.
I am Christian and I think that Christians need not study evolution unless they have doubts. Otherwise, disproving evolution to a believer of it is somewhat blatant, disrespectful, and out of place.
I don't think this Christian has really understood all the nuts and bolts of evolution and the universe, and two hours isn't really enough, even if you're skimming galaxies of information.
His first question shows he is clueless, a Poe or is deliberately ignoring the evidence.
He is just regurgitating the non-stop lies spewed by Hovind et al and the later ';questions'; are just confirmation of that.
And as for ';fossils only showed that something has died'; you are as clueless as ';disciple';. Evolution and the theory was based on the examination of existing organisms, examination in detail that you might find difficult to comprehend.
Two hours is plenty time for them realize the difference between evolution and how the universe was created.. Obviously they are a liar in saying they've ';read the theory of evolution.';
Don't worry, Rev. 21:8 says they, as a liar, ';will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur.'; So it all works out in the end.
I know some christians who believe in evolution and study physics. It's just when they hear someone saying ';praise the lord'; that they switch off all the common sense and enter a different world altogether. I admit they are really very versatile in this switching and jumping between two modes. Basically, they don't mix them, when they're in one mode, they don't think of the other.
';ive read the theory of evolution and the so called but to say everything just fell into place the solar system the elements of gravity and the distance of the planets from the sun and the moon being perfect the rotation of the earth all just happening by coincidence is too hard to believe';
That has nothing to do with evolution in the first place
Dude to tell you the truth I really don't give a damn about Christians. They are doomed. They lack knowledge of many things which is even in the Bible. Christians go against their own Bibles. You read Bible Code and it speaks about a connection between Evolution and the Hebrew deity Yahweh. If its not in the non complex Bible Christians will not believe it. Only because they limit their mind. For instance Exodus 3:15 all Christians believe that God's name is ' I AM who I Am', when that's not a name being revealed but a statement. They lack the knowledge of simple stuff that a child can understand and they expect to be saving peoples soul. Give me a damn break.
Don't go generalizing, now. You know it's just this individual you're talking about, and it didn't take him 2 hours to understand and reject it all, he was just having dinner. He had already rejected it before turning on the microwave.
How long does it take a Christian to examine all the evidence for evolution and conclude it's false?
About as long as it took 'C' to come up with such a witty answer.
If it was up to christians they would still have the Earth at the center of the Solar system. Look how long it took for them to apologize for that.
As always they just make stuff up.
Having read ';the theory of evolution'; (which is a doubtful claim at best) means nothing, even if it were true.
The question shows the person has no understanding of evolution.
Examine evidence?
Creationists?
ROFLcopter
and its funny once again breaking the commandment by bearing false witness cause if dud had read anything about evolution he wouldnt even touch astronomy
I'm betting that person didn't even look at what was presented. He probably just watched another Hovind video.
After two hours he hasn't even figured out the difference between biology and astronomy? LOL
What would you say to someone like Dean Kenyon, a former chemical evolutionist who spent many years in study and has concluded that the Darwinian explanations (as they now exist) are no better than fairy tales... in fact, they are worse than fairy tales. The tales are at least meant to be taken as tales. But this so called theory - with all its 'just so stories' and endless speculations - is meant to be taken seriously!
2 seconds.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
Bones and fossils only prove that something died
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)